Critics have hit out at the decision to give Peter Handke a Nobel Prize for Literature.
The Austrian playwright, novelist and poet was awarded the 2019 prize on Thursday.
He is a highly controversial figure for his support for the Serbs during the 1990s Yugoslav war.
Albania’s Foreign Minister Gent Cakaj wrote on Twitter that the award was shameful and had been awarded to a “genocide denier”.
The Austrian author said he was “astonished” at winning the prize adding that the decision was “very courageous by the Swedish Academy”.
The Swedish Academy which oversees the prestigious award said in a statement that Mr Handke had been recognised for “an influential work that with linguistic ingenuity has explored the periphery and the specificity of human experience”.
He will receive nine million Swedish kronor (£740,000), as well as a medal and a diploma.
However many have hit out against the academy’s decision to hand the prize to a man who was considered close to former Serb leader Slobodan Milosevic.
Mr Handke spoke at his funeral in 2006.
He once denied the Serbian massacre at Srebrenica and compared Serbia’s fate to that of Jews during the Holocaust – although he later apologised for what he called a “slip of the tongue”.
“Never thought [I] would feel to vomit because of a Nobel Prize,” Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama wrote on Twitter.
Kosovo President Hashim Thaci tweeted: “The decision of Nobel Prize brought immense pain to countless victims.”
Emir Suljagic, a survivor of the massacre of more than 8,000 Muslim men from Srebrenica said: “A Milosevic fan and notorious genocide-denier gets Nobel prize in literature … What a time to be alive.”
PEN America said it was “dumbfounded by the selection of a writer who has used his public voice to undercut historical truth”, in a statement from its president, Jennifer Egan.
British author Hari Kunzru also criticised the decision. He told the Guardian: “More than ever we need public intellectuals who are able to make a robust defence of human rights in the face of the indifference and cynicism of our political leaders. Handke is not such a person.”